There are multiple newsletters with similiar ****** statements, seems like a writer would had made ****** statements in exactly 1 issue before being fired if I had a similiar newsletter where I didn’t write all of the articles. But hey, maybe I’m not the reasonable type.
Why did Ron Paul allow so many ****** statements to be made in so many of his newsletters?
There are multiple newsletters with similiar ****** statements, seems like a writer would had made ****** statements in exactly 1 issue before being fired if I had a similiar newsletter where I didn’t write all of the articles. But hey, maybe I’m not the reasonable type.
9 Responses
June 20th, 2009 at 2:59 am
Because he’s a bigot?
June 20th, 2009 at 6:53 pm
If Hillary was not the biggest threat to republicans and didn’t have the most chance to win, you wouldn’t see so many republicans supporting Obama, like Schwazenegger’s wife and Goldman Sachs and many other powerful people.
there is a reason to there madness.
Vote Hilary
Your all so easily Played, no wonder the Republicans win
June 22nd, 2009 at 10:22 am
I don’t think he has a lot of control over what is said about him.
June 23rd, 2009 at 11:10 pm
What is interesting is that a lot of those statements were made by Southern Democrats, who were contributors to that newsletter.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:33 am
well, if it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck…pass the orange glaze and the wild rice stuffing
June 26th, 2009 at 6:31 pm
TROLL ALERT!
June 29th, 2009 at 4:46 pm
He was out of congress and practicing medicine. He wasnt in Washington to see the newsletters. When he did get back he fired the people. I dont see the problem.
July 1st, 2009 at 8:41 am
Because he’s a douchebag.
Vote Obama
July 3rd, 2009 at 5:44 pm
Some people believe he is a very ****** man.